Since January, 2003
            
 Page Through from Before to After

Last week DDOT released its Southeast Blvd. Feasibility Study, in which the agency "evaluated the feasibility of transitioning a segment of the former Southeast Freeway from 11th Street to Barney Circle into an urban boulevard more consistent with the expected travel demand and the character of the adjacent neighborhood."
This study was a follow-on to the Office of Planning's Southeast Blvd. Planning Study, which came about after residents expressed displeasure with the initial efforts seen in the Barney Circle-Southeast Blvd. Transportation Planning Study.
And what does the feasibility study say? DDOT's report determines that changing the current Southeast Blvd. from the limited-access quick route between 11th Street SE and Barney Circle to a street with connections to its north and south and development along the footprint is feasible, but the transformation "would be neither inexpensive nor quick."
The study then goes through the issues that make clear this would not be a snap-the-fingers-and-make-it-so proposition:
*Ownership: There are two small parcels within the study area owned by the National Park Service--and we know quickly either arranging for a change in ownership or "coordinating" with NPS can go. The study refers to it as being clear "that there would be significant process requirements and challenges to disposing the NPS and incorporating them into private development." That the process to "surplus" any excess land along the footprint not needed for the road(s) itself is governed by the Federal Highway Administration would also not point to a lightning-quick resolution.
* Transit Garages: The inclusion of some location that would allow for the parking of tour buses, transit buses and streetcars {cough}--a big part of DDOT's wishes for the area but something that residents are not particularly keen on--"could be provided at Southeast Boulevard that takes advantage of the location and topography of the site to minimize visual impacts to surrounding neighborhoods and so that vehicles accessing the facility would not use residential neighborhood streets."
* Cost: The study's "cursory assessment" says that constructing the transportation elements of the project would cost around $120 million, with a transit garage adding about $65-70 million in costs (in 2015 dollars). This includes reconfiguring Barney Circle into an at-grade signalized traffic circle, raising Southeast Boulevard to the same level as L Street, and constructing a four-lane street that includes sidewalks, bike facilities, and traffic signals. Plus some contingency costs built in.
* Schedule: The graphic at right breaks out a not-short ballpark timeline of 10 years for both the "transportation" portion of the project and the land redevelopment project.
With all of that, DDOT says that the first step forward is to restart the Barney Circle and Southeast Blvd. Transportation Planning Study begun in 2013, though even that now has a road block, that this Environmental Assessment now can't be completed "until a financial plan for project implementation is identified and included in the regional Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan (CLRP)." DDOT advises interested groups "to continue discussions with a broad spectrum of stakeholders during the EA to confirm community support for the project, engage with AWI Signatories, and evaluate project costs and funding options."
This final draft was presented to ANC 6B's Transportation Committee on Jan. 6, and Capitol Hill Corner reports that DDOT's representative told the committee that there were no "fatal flaws" in any of the Office of Planning's three concepts for reimagining the road--but that it will be "up to ANC 6B to push the project forward" by requesting the environmental assessment.
I am skimming it all, so if this project is of interest to you, be sure to read the feasibility report, and perhaps attend ANC 6B's meeting on Jan. 12, at which a draft letter will apparently be considered to support going ahead with the EA.
You can also wander through my posts on the subject from the past few years, especially on the completion of the OP study back in July and the three general concepts advanced for how to remake this stretch of land that currently serves as such a barrier between Capitol Hill/Hill East and the Anacostia River.
Comments (7)
   
 
 More About Traffic Issues

JDLand.com Home

Comments

dude says: (1/11/16 7:42 AM)
Seems like an awful lot of money for what it achieves.


jdc says: (1/11/16 8:32 AM)
To me this is sort of a 'no brainer' in terms of spreading around - and linking to - the massive redevelopment going on in near SE. From the city's perspective, more development = more taxes.


202_cyclist says: (1/11/16 8:56 AM)
@jdc:

Exactly right-- someone posted a comment on the Capitol Hill Corner blog estimating the expected future tax revenue of creating an entirely new neighborhood: link

Additionally, there are other benefits, such as linking neighborhoods and allowing more people to live in a walkable neighborhood and near transit, including the Potomac Ave station.


monkeyrotica says: (1/11/16 10:22 AM)
More roads = more congestion. Why does this "boulevard" even exist? Instead of spending $120 mil (which will eventually bloat to $200+ mil) just sell the land, build residential/retail, and re-open the north/south streets.


conngs0 says: (1/11/16 11:01 AM)
Agree with jdc. Doesn't the status quo risk maintaining a barrier between the planned development in Hill East by Stadium Armory and the 11th Street Bridge Park and the rest of the Navy Yard area? It sure seems like this would help maximize the returns on those other investments.


jdc says: (1/11/16 12:03 PM)
My fantasy - yes, I may need help - is that the explosive growth and interest in SE, then SW, and then 'eco district' they're building around L'Enfant, will lead to financial incentives sometime in my lifetime to tunneling and locating 695/SE-SE Freeway underground. Basically, selling air rights. It's about 5 miles as configured, and I wonder if that figure could be cut down if it took a more direct route. Yes, everyone will think of the "Big Dig" mess - but, a recent piece sort of exonerated the project and I bet in another 10-20 years it will be an accepted piece of US infrastructure. Plus, the lessons learned and the advancement in drilling will make this an easier project in all likelihood.


conngs0 says: (1/11/16 2:05 PM)
Even in the case of the Big Dig, I don't think it's the project itself that needs exoneration - it's the execution of the project. One of the reasons why the people of Boston were so against hosting the Olympics was that, based on the cost overruns and delays, they had zero faith that their local government could properly execute such a huge expenditure. After all, it's not that hosting an Olympics has to cripple the local economy; it's that hosting an Olympics typical cripples the local economy because the host country/city does such a poor job of planning the games.

I have a similar opinion of your fantasy regarding putting the SE Freeway underground. Would it benefit the neighborhood and the city (and commuters)? Could it be a worthwhile project? Absolutely. But you have to have faith in the execution.

An even better example of this phenomenon is the Metro 2040 plan. link This would undoubtedly be fantastic for the city. It'll never happen though because the people responsible for implementing such a plan will certainly mess it up!

Let's see how the Capitol Crossing project pans out. If that winds up being a success, perhaps there will be more support for significant infrastructure improvement along the lines you have in mind.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed


 More News


See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 
 Recent Posts

CJBabyDaddy on Roundup of Some: Looks like the final piece of the final arch of the New Frederick Douglass Memor...
GarfieldPark on Roundup of Some: Wagtime has now turned into Dogtopia? New owners or what?
CJBabyDaddy on Roundup of Some: To my fellow New FDMB arch geeks: As of COB Friday, August 7, nine of the twelv...
CJBabyDaddy on Roundup of Some: La Famosa (1st floor of the Bower) targeting a late August or early September op...
GarfieldPark on Roundup of Some: Target date of Wed Aug 12th for I ST CVS. Can't come soon enough!
JES on Roundup of Some: It looks like punch bowl isn't completely dead, as they're reopening some locati...
Get JDLand Updates In Your Inbox!



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
600 B/O L ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 08/10/20
800 B/O POTOMAC AVE SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 08/09/20
1000 B/O L ST SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 08/04/20
1000 B/O 8TH ST SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 08/02/20
1100 B/O 2ND PLACE SE   BURGLARY
Burglary Two
 07/31/20
100 B/O I ST SE   THEFT
Theft First Degree (all Other Larceny)
 07/30/20
100 B/O O ST SE   ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON  07/28/20
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Shoplifting
 07/24/20
100 B/O M ST SE   BURGLARY
Burglary Two
 07/20/20
UNIT B/O N ST SE   ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON  07/20/20
1200 B/O HALF ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 07/13/20

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1300 4TH ST SE 1001   
07/22/20 
LA FAMOSA / null
E2009613 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1300 4TH ST SE 130   
07/24/20 
TOM AN / KIMOY LALLEMENT
A2005055 / CONSTRUCTION
New sail shade awning at exterior private space of La Famosa restaurant (Permit #TL2000028)
1150 5TH ST SE   
07/16/20 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / null
P2007453 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
07/22/20 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / null
E2009571 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
08/04/20 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / KEVIN HURLEY
SB2000405 / CONSTRUCTION
We propose to perform 2 soil borings to maximum depths up to 50 feet below grade, or refusal. The borings will be advanced with a geotechnical drill rig, which utilizes 3.25" hollow stem augers. Upon completion, the borings will be backfilled with bentonite slurry, in general accordance with DOEE requirements.
10 I ST SE   
07/27/20 
CAPITOL HILL RACQUET CLUB / ANDREW ARNOLD; NA
SB2000413 / CONSTRUCTION
We propose drilling two (2), six-inch diameter geotechnical test borings (B-7 and B-8) using the hollow stem auger method to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The proposed test boring depths will be 85 feet below the existing ground surface. If a confining unit is encountered, outer casing will be installed which will extend 10 feet into the top of the confining unit or to the top of bedrock. Up...
150 I ST SE   
07/30/20 
SQUARE 737 LLC C/O WC SMITH / RUSSELL COX
B2007765 / CONSTRUCTION
Amendment to B1709058. Decrease number of dwelling units to 373 units. Construction of 2 spas. Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing changes.
423 L ST SE   
07/24/20 
JOHN P LANG / MARGO RICKS
SOL2001665 / CONSTRUCTION
To install 4.56 kW size of solar panels with a system height of 1.1 feet on roof of building.
250 M ST SE   
07/21/20 
SQUARE 769 LLC / null
E2009527 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
08/04/20 
SQUARE 769 LLC / BRIAN C STROTT; SQUARE 769 LLC
B1915078 / CONSTRUCTION
Revisions to permit B1813732. Changes to the roof area. Adding mechanical equipment to roof.
300 M ST SE   
07/27/20 
FEDERAL CENTER LP / null
E2009758 / SUPPLEMENTAL
861 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
07/23/20 
GREYSTAR GP LLC / null
M2003144 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1105 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
07/23/20 
GALLERY CAPITAL RIVERFRONT PROPERTY LLC / null
E2009620 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE 20590   
08/05/20 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / null
E2010040 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1275 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
08/05/20 
US GOVERNMENT / null
E2010054 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
08/07/20 
FC FACILITATOR LLC FOREST CITY REALTY TRUST / null
P2007950 / SUPPLEMENTAL
79 POTOMAC AVE SE 505   
07/15/20 
null / NA NA NA
EHOP20993669 / HOME OCCUPATION
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
No commercial transaction records added or modified in the past two weeks.


Project Directory
Completed
Thompson Hotel ('20)
West Half ('19)
Novel South Capitol ('19)
Yards/Guild Apts. ('19)
Capper/The Harlow ('19)
New DC Water HQ ('19)
Yards/Bower Condos ('19)
Virginia Ave. Tunnel ('19)
99 M ('18)
Agora ('18)
1221 Van ('18)
District Winery ('17)
Insignia on M ('17)
F1rst/Residence Inn ('17)
One Hill South ('17)
Homewood Suites ('16)
ORE 82 ('16)
The Bixby ('16)
Dock 79 ('16)
Community Center ('16)
The Brig ('16)
Park Chelsea ('16)
Yards/Arris ('16)
Hampton Inn ('15)
Southeast Blvd. ('15)
11th St. Bridges ('15)
Parc Riverside ('14)
Twelve12/Yards ('14)
Lumber Shed ('13)
Boilermaker Shops ('13)
Camden South Cap. ('13)
Canal Park ('12)
Capitol Quarter ('12)
225 Virginia/200 I ('12)
Foundry Lofts ('12)
1015 Half Street ('10)
Yards Park ('10)
Velocity Condos ('09)
Teague Park ('09)
909 New Jersey Ave. ('09)
55 M ('09)
100 M ('08)
Onyx ('08)
70/100 I ('08)
Nationals Park ('08)
Seniors Bldg Demo ('07)
400 M ('07)
Douglass Bridge Fix ('07)
US DOT HQ ('07)
20 M ('07)
Capper Seniors 1 ('06)
Capitol Hill Tower ('06)
Courtyard/Marriott ('06)
Marine Barracks ('04)


Overviews
Capper/Carrollsburg
Anacostia Riverwalk
New Jersey Avenue
M Street
South Capitol Street
The Yards
Lower 8th Street
East M Street
Boathouse Row





                  © Copyright 2020 JD.