Since January, 2003
 (a random before-and-after moment)
February 8, 2006
March 29, 2015 
Half at Potomac, Looking Northeast (see more)

It was a busy ANC 6D meeting on Monday night for Near Southeast-related issues, so I'm going to put it all in a series of posts:
* New Jersey Avenue Underpass Art: The Capitol Riverfront BID gave an update on the "Water Pylons" art installation, which is now moving forward after being "dormant" for about a year. This is the project partially funded by a grant from the DC Commission on Arts and Humanities that will paint and light the pylons holding up the Southeast Freeway in a "modern representation of water that announces New Jersey Avenue, SE as a gateway to the Capitol Riverfront community." The reflective blue paint should go up in July, followed by light fixtures in August, and the installation should be dedicated in September, which will be right around the time that DCCAH moves into its new nearby digs at 225 Virginia/200 I. Passers-by may note that new fences and LED overhead lighting have already been installed along New Jersey as part of the transformation of the underpass. The BID's presentation to the ANC, with more information about the project, is here.
* Parking Parking Parking: There was a discussion about issues with game-day parking in the neighborhood, specifically the prohibition of parking along K and L streets, as well as other restrictions that have made residents unhappy. Damon Harvey of DDOT says that the agency is "reassessing" the current configuration, to figure out how to provide better access to residents while not allowing stadium-goers to then hog all the parking. He expects that changes will be announced in a month or so that will allow for "greater residential protection during games." One other non-game day change for residents has already gone into effect: meters are now turned off at 6:30 pm (but still 10 pm on game days).
However, those who came to the meeting hoping to hear about changes in the Residential Parking Permit system that would allow residents in the high-rise buildings west of Canal Park to park on the street throughout Ward 6 were disappointed, as DDOT continues to hold that large residential buildings in mixed-use neighborhoods will not qualify for RPP. (Harvey used the Ellington on U Street as a specific example of this being the case elsewhere in the city, but there are more buildings in this situation than just that one and the Near Southeast ones.)
Also, in somewhat related news the ANC unanimously passed a resolution protesting the plan in the mayor's new budget to redirect most performance parking proceeds to other areas, such as Metro, rather than their being used as originally intended, to fund non-automotive transportation improvements in the neighborhood.
Comments (11)
 
 More About ANC News

JDLand.com Home

Comments

ZoolanderANDtheBoYz says: (5/15/12 10:39 AM)
What's the update on Canal Park Construction?


JD says: (5/15/12 10:44 AM)
That would be what I meant by "series of posts." Not able to get to all of it at once.


202_cyclist says: (5/15/12 11:07 AM)
The Atlantic Cities blog has a great article this morning about the Southeast waterfront neighborhood.

link


Boris says: (5/15/12 11:44 AM)
JD, did they give an "official" reason for this? I mean we all know the city cut some kind of deal with the developers, but what is City Hall saying about it?

"However, those who came to the meeting hoping to hear about changes in the Residential Parking Permit system that would allow residents in the high-rise buildings west of Canal Park to park on the street throughout Ward 6 were disappointed, as DDOT continues to hold that large residential buildings in mixed-use neighborhoods will not qualify for RPP. (Harvey used the Ellington on U Street as a specific example of this being the case elsewhere in the city, but there are more buildings in this situation than just that one and the Near Southeast ones.)"


JD says: (5/15/12 12:03 PM)
It's not a "deal with developers"--it's how parking is handled in a mixed-use area, to prevent every parking space from being perpetually taken by residents, meaning that businesses, restaurants, etc., would have little expectation of visitors being able to park. As I said, there are multiple big apartment buildings in the city where residents don't get RPP stickers. This was a position supported by Tommy Wells when the plans for ballpark-area parking were first laid out, btw.


Boris says: (5/15/12 1:20 PM)
Tommy Wells, wrong again? Say it isn't so. My point is (and then I'll shut up) that renters on or near 7th or 8th get stickers and the same argument could be made in those (commercial) areas of the Hill. And I thought the point of having a metro station in the neighborhood was to discourage people from driving into our area? Lastly, I personally don't want a sticker to park in our neighborhood. I want it to park in those areas of the Hill I can't walk to and have to pay for now. I'll stop now.


Parking4Us says: (5/15/12 2:33 PM)
Our area was built with substantial public and private parking available to ensure that the businesses in the area have visitor/high turnover spots available. It also has an immense amount of street parking available for residential parking. The city however has artificially reduced the number of parking spaces usable by residents in our area which burdens us disproportionately when compared to both existing and potential commercial entities. There probably is not a vast conspiracy between the city and the developers but it certainly does imply they are not paying attention to the REAL needs of the neighborhood as a whole. We want neighborhood visitors to come to the businesses in our area just like the surrounding areas (barracks row, eastern market, etc.) want us to visit theirs. Increasing zone 6 RPP will only increase that commerce in the larger SE, not hinder it. Non-neighborhood visitors will utilize the commercial lots and remaining metered parking anyway so this would not affect them.


Shogungts says: (5/16/12 2:37 PM)
The only meaningful thing that would happen if they expanded RPP to the high rises is that people that live in Capitol Quarter* (and perhaps even some parts north of the highway when other high rises are built) would not have a place to park as they would be flooded with cars from the high rises. Now I am sure there are some examples somewhere, but I can not think of any areas in DC, Arlington, or any other locations which give high rises parking permits for zoned residential areas.

Parking4Us point about other parts of Zone 6 is actually an interesting one, but I imagine it would be quite an ordeal for the city to figure out zoning in that manner. For example, how do they zone so that person A can park in all of zone 6 be except for part 1 (b/c they are in a high rise in part 1) and person B can park in all of zone 6 except for part 2 (b/c they are in a high rise in part 2) and person C can park anywhere in Zone 6 b/c they are in a row house. All of this so you can drive to other parts of Zone 6?

In my opinion, if you live in an high rise, you should plan to secure parking through your building. If your building has a bad parking deal (looking at you Capitol Hill Towers), it is not the city's fault.

*Disclaimer, I do not live in Capitol Quarter.


Shogungts says: (5/16/12 2:40 PM)
As for Boris's comment:

"And I thought the point of having a metro station in the neighborhood was to discourage people from driving into our area?"

It's also to lessen your need for a car.


JD says: (5/16/12 2:45 PM)
... And once you allow Ward 6 parking on more streets in the neighborhood, you'll suddenly find a whole lot more people from Ward 6 driving to baseball games, fighting for the spaces as well. That's one of the reasons that Capitol Quarter people can have trouble finding street parking during games. (It's an issue that the streets just across South Capitol in SW deal with, along with people handing out their Ward 6 guest parking pass to ballpark-goers--all of which takes away parking from residents.)



PJY03 says: (5/16/12 6:27 PM)
We're arguing over two separate things here. Its fairly obvious that there's never going to be enough Zone 6 parking for resident's of high rise buildings to rely on it as their primary parking resource. Even if they opened up a lot more zone 6 parking, you'd have to be out of your mind thinking you could reasonably count on this to meet your residential parking needs. This is why I bought a garage space in my building. You need one if you live here.

So the quantity of parking isn't the issue. I could care less whether they increase the number of zone 6 parking spots available in the neighborhood. I just want the right to the same damn sticker every other tax payer of the ward has. How hard is that? If they have the theoretical right to park in my neighborhood, I should have the right to park in theirs. Its not about opening up more spaces for zone 6 residential parking. Its about treating residents of high rises fairly.

The market will allocate the limited number of spaces efficiently on its own. But you have to treat all city residents fairly.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed

See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 
 Top News
  
Recent Comments:  
JD on Tuesday Tidbits: You have to admit, during those odd times when the site is actually responding, it is *way* faster o...
JD on Bonchon Officially Opening: I know exactly what site it is. It's Square 769N, which I've written about many times. 171 un...
conngs0 on The Riverfront Apartments/Florida: I think part of the reason why the parking garages were so palatable was that everyone knew that the...
202_cyclist on Bonchon Officially Opening: There was a drilling crew on site today but I don't know, perhaps they got to the site early to tail...



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
0 B/O POTOMAC AVE SE   ROBBERY
Robbery/Attempt To Commit Robbery
 03/28/15
600 B/O VIRGINIA AVE SE   ROBBERY  03/22/15
300 B/O TINGEY ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 03/22/15
500 B/O L ST SE   THEFT
Theft 1st Degree
 03/21/15
50 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 03/10/15
300 B/O L ST SE   MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT
Unauthorized Use Of Vehicle
 03/08/15
700 B/O L ST SE   ROBBERY
Robbery -- Force & Violence
 03/07/15
1300 B/O 4TH ST SE   THEFT
Theft 1 (Theft F/Building)
 03/02/15
70 B/O I ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 03/01/15
100 B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 03/01/15

Active Public Space Permits Archive  
No records added or modified in the past two weeks.

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1233 1ST ST SE   
03/25/15 
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC / APS INSPECTIONS
B1403486 / CONSTRUCTION
THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE 1233 1ST ST SE SUBMISSION IS THE CORE AND SHELL ONLY OF A NEW 12 STORY BUILDING. THE APPROXIMATELY 127 200 SF BUILDING IS INTENDED TO BE A HOTEL. THE FUTURE INTERIOR FIT-OUT WILL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY. THE BUILDING WILL SIT ON TOP OF GROUND FLOOR RETAIL / LOBBY LEVEL SUBMITTED AS PART OF A SEPARATE SUBMISSION FOR 1277 1ST ST SE.
1277 1ST ST SE   
03/25/15 
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC / BALL PARK SQUARE LLC
B1403488 / CONSTRUCTION
THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE 1277 1ST ST SE SUBMISSION INCLUDES 2 LEVELS OF BELOW GRADE PARKING TOTALING 370-380 PARKING SPACES A GROUND FLOOR RETAIL / LOBBY / LOADING LEVEL WITH APPROXIMATELY 26 500 SF OF RETAIL AND AN APPROXIMATELY 304 000 SF 13 STORY APARTMENT BUILDING CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 326 UNITS.
1299 1ST ST SE   
03/16/15 
BALL PARK SQUARE LLC / PHYLLIS STEVENS
B1403487 / CONSTRUCTION
THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE 1299 1ST ST SE SUBMISSION IS THE CORE AND SHELL OF A NEW APPROXIMATELY 7 600 SF 2 STORY RETAIL BUILDING WITH A SINGLE BASEMENT LEVEL. THE BUILDING IS INTENDED TO BE A RESTAURANT. THE FUTURE INTERIOR FIT-OUT WILL BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY.
909 HALF ST SE   
03/26/15 
23 I LLC / WAYNE REEP; 23 I LLC; WAYNE REEP
E37408577 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1015 HALF ST SE   
03/17/15 
BON CHON / PHILIP GODAIRE; BON CHON; PHILIP GODAIRE
P42469697 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/17/15 
EVAN OBRIEN / JOSEPH ABRESCH; EVAN OBRIEN; ROBERT HUNSBERGER
E74054014 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/25/15 
HALF ST SE LLC / GEORGE DELGADO
B1501688 / CONSTRUCTION
INTERIOR ALTERATION TO 3 4 5 FLOORS AND PARTIAL 6TH FLOOR. WORK TO INCLUDE ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING
   
03/25/15 
SAM HOLLEN / GARY MCVEY; SAM HOLLEN; GARY MCVEY
E58849835 / SUPPLEMENTAL
82 I ST SE   
03/17/15 
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC / MITCH A. PERMUY
E1504130 / SUPPLEMENTAL
100 I ST SE   
03/26/15 
NA NA NA
EHOP1590452 / HOME OCCUPATION
300 M ST SE   
03/13/15 
FEDERAL CENTER LP / GREGORY E LIGON
E1504060 / SUPPLEMENTAL
250 M ST SE   
03/12/15 
DAN MCCABE / MICHAEL YASEK
SB1500183 / CONSTRUCTION
FIVE 70-FOOT GEOTECHNICAL SPT SOIL BORINGS WILL BE PERFORMED WITH AN AUGER DRILLING RIG UTILIZING CONTINUOUS FLIGHT HOLLOW STEM AUGERS CREATING APPROXIMATELY 6-INCH DIAMETER BOREHOLES.
909 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
03/16/15 
909 NEW JERSEY AVENUE ACQUISITION LLC / DENNIS LEE WINDSOR
M1501348 / SUPPLEMENTAL
ONE UNIT IS A 10 TON UNIT AND 2 ADDITIONAL UNITS ARE 7.5TONS
   
03/17/15 
909 NEW JERSEY AVENUE ACQUISITION LLC / DAVID L. HAHN
P1504255 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1000 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
03/14/15 
PHILIP BROWN
PC93167082 / POST CARD
REPLACEMENT OF NOT MORE THAN 1 GAS APPLIANCE ON A RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT.
1111 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
03/19/15 
NJA ASSOCIATES LLC / THOMAS P MCGUIRE
E1504215 / SUPPLEMENTAL
25 POTOMAC AVE SE   
03/18/15 
RIVERFRONT HOLDINGS I LLC / GLENNWOOD ROGERS
P1504172 / SUPPLEMENTAL
301 WATER ST SE   
03/13/15 
FOREST CITY / FVI 2020
TL1500054 / CONSTRUCTION
NEW RESTAURANT TENANT LAYOUT AT THE LUMBER SHED PARCEL FOR AN OYSTER BAR WITH 55 INTERIOR SEATS (55 AT 1ST LEVEL AND 30 AT MEZZANINE) 10 STAFF AND 38 OUTDOOR SUMMER GARDEN SEATING.
   
03/13/15 
FC LUMBER SHED LLC / FLACK
TL1500055 / CONSTRUCTION
FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT LOCATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR WITH A TOTAL NUMBER OF SEATS OF 170. INDOORS SEATING IS 86 OUTDOORS SEATING IS 84 ALL OUTDOOR SEATS ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 189 WHICH INCLUDES 19 STAFF.
   
03/18/15 
FC LUMBER SHED LLC / SEAN O JOHN
P1504295 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/19/15 
FC LUMBER SHED LLC / DONALD V. ELLENBERGER
M1501405 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/20/15 
LUMBER SHED LIC / ROBERT WATTS; LUMBER SHED LIC; ROBERT WATTS
E99575145 / SUPPLEMENTAL
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
1201 HALF ST SE   02/19/15
$ 9,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL II LLC
 
N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0038 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0036 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
R N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0030 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0032 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
1275 HALF ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
HALF ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
M ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 


Project Directory




     © Copyright 2015 JD.