Since January, 2003
 (a random before-and-after moment)
February 19, 2006
January 8, 2012
1st at Anacostia River, Looking North (see more)

On Monday night, the city's Zoning Commission had its first crack at the new request for modifications to the existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Florida Rock site across the street from Nationals Park, as the commissioners deliberated on whether to "set down" the request for a hearing. As mentioned previously, the developers want to change the site's first phase from office to residential, and also have done some reworking of the rest of the design for the six-acre site that the Zoning Commission approved after much deliberation and tweaking back in 2008.
Commissioner Michael Turnbull was first out of the gate with comments about the new designs, and he was not at all happy, calling it a "major gut" to the original PUD, saying that he felt the applicant should start the PUD process all over again. Describing the new plans as "bastardized," "stick architecture from the suburbs," "boxy," "10 steps backward," and "an affront to the Zoning Commission" and city residents, Turnbull pledged to be "so damn critical" if the new design moves forward. (If you've got a few minutes, you can watch his remarks for yourself.)
Commissioner Peter May, on the other hand, said that he is actually more comfortable with the new design, given that there were features he "really questioned" in the 2008 design, but that the latest filing is "pretty simplistic" in terms of the drawings, and did say that the architecture is "kind of boring," especially from the waterside view. (The image at right is the Phase 1 residential building, as seen from the river.) He also wanted to see more comparisons to the previously approved design so that they could understand more what they may be giving up with the new design, but that he found the overall plan "more appealing than before."
Vice-chair Konrad Schlater's biggest concern was over the scaling back of the retail component, which has gone from 80,000 square feet of "retail and service uses" in the 2008 PUD to about 23,400 square feet in the new filing, with 7,000 sf of that being turned over to residential amenities "until a retail market is established." "It seems like a missed opportunity to have space on the boardwalk that is not retail," Schlater said, adding that the city does not have a lot of projects right on a waterfront like this, and that the entire development really should be a retail destination. (He also caught that, while the 2008 PUD called for LEED certification for each phase, the new filing says that the project "will be LEED certifiable for each phase." Semantics, or...?)
With commission chair Anthony Hood not in attendance, the four commissioners decided to defer a decision on the set-down request until Hood can weigh in with his thoughts; this would also give the developers time to file additional information, such as comparing the new designs with the 2008 plans. This could come up at the next public hearing, on Feb. 13.
So, what are the differences?
With the entire filing available online (if you search), I was able to go through and cull out some of the most representative drawings from this new design, which I've put on my Florida Rock project page. At the bottom of that page you can also see some images of the designs that were approved in 2008. The first image at left, from 2008 (click to enlarge), shows the four buildings and the public spaces with a lot of curves and glass and "articulation."
Compare that to the latest design. While this is clearly a very early drawing, it does show four much more boxy structures, as commissioner Turnbull said. You can also see the curves-versus-corners differences in the site-plan comparison graphic I created, which also shows the differing layouts of the public spaces, again going from a lot of flowing, rounded paths and open areas to straighter-edged movements, with the total amount of "lot occupancy" going down to 44 percent in the new design from 58 percent in the old. The phase 1 apartment building is the most fleshed out in the renderings, but there are additional drawings giving a general sense of the site layout.
The Office of Planning's setdown report goes through the changes requested in a fair amount of detail.
It will be interesting to see how this the Zoning Commission handles this, as well as ANC 6D, which has always been very supportive of this project during its long gestation but has not yet had an opportunity to weigh in/vote on the new design. (And of course, we here at JDLand want to know what YOU think!) The developers are hoping to begin construction on the first phase apartment building in Spring 2013, but it would appear that this zoning process, like everything else tied to this project up to now, may not be as speedy as they might want.
If you want more background on how the commission reached its approvals in 2008, my many (MANY!) posts on the project are worth browsing, including the one I wrote in December detailing the changes in the new request. And do check out the latest drawings (and scroll down for the old ones).
Comments (10)
 
 More About Florida Rock
 All posts: Florida Rock, zoning

JDLand.com Home

Comments

btz says: (2/2/12 6:00 PM)
This design is not a revolution in urban planning and seems to be a quick and cheap way to cash in on a hot rental market in DC. Which is what this whole "redesignation of Phase 1" seems like on the part of Florida Rock. Nothing wrong with that if you're the developer but holistically speaking DC and the residents of Near SE can and should do better. we shouldn't let them cash in on a hot market when so much has been promised by the way of urban planning and waterfront planning. I would attempt to stop this design in its current conception any way possible.


btz says: (2/2/12 6:01 PM)
it looks like L'enfant plaza buildings.


lefabe says: (2/2/12 6:40 PM)
it looks like more bullshit like the JPI apartments.


David Garber says: (2/2/12 7:03 PM)
MRP Realty, who had planned to re-present plans at our February ANC meeting, has now decided to take another month to work on design modifications based on Zoning Commission comments and a *substantial* set of comments submitted on behalf of the Citizens Development Advisory Committee (made up of residents of this neighborhood who have expressed interest in giving input on new development that comes through the ANC).

Seeing as this is a hugely visible and precedent-setting direct waterfront/parkfront building, I'm definitely looking forward to seeing how these plans progress based on the input they've been given up to this point.

If any neighborhood residents want to join the Development Advisory Committee, please send me an email: dggarber at gmail.


JD says: (2/2/12 7:07 PM)
David--Is there a web site or mailing list or somewhere that residents who aren't on your advisory committee can find out exactly what the committee's feedback is and what projects they are working on? Seems like something that would be of interest to people, to know what their fellow residents are giving as feedback on behalf of the neighborhood as a whole.



David Garber says: (2/2/12 7:43 PM)
JD--As a clarification, the committee is not claiming to speak for the neighborhood as a whole, although the more input I get the better I'm able to respond when they present to us at the ANC meetings.

I originally publicized the advisory committee on the neighborhood email list (www.groups.google.com/group/navy-yard-neighbors), my ANC Facebook page (www.facebook.com/voteGarber), and on Twitter (www.twitter.com/GarberDC) --but if there are others still interested in joining, please don't hesitate to be in touch! More voices=better.


swdckp says: (2/3/12 10:33 AM)
Fight the power, Mr. Turnbull! The renderings look really awful-- they remind me of Tiber Island in SW.


G ST SE says: (2/3/12 10:57 AM)
Hold the line. There is only one chance to get this right. Demand more creative architecture and put the pressure on developers to absorb the costs. Tiber Island in SW is a gross example of a waterfront done poorl y and it has mucked up the vision for nearly 50 years. Reject the boxy cheap designs and require more attractive options which embrace the waterfront concepts and access to the Anacostia for all.

Everything else will follow this lead - good or bad. Don't believe the developer hype - require them to make commitments to excellence in design and usage!


ttassa says: (2/3/12 11:11 AM)
I'm not expert, but just a frequenter of this site. The new plans and latest designs seem like a big disappointment. Why try and screw this one up? What's the point of building something that isn't a destination. Step up.


MalS says: (2/3/12 1:02 PM)
The original approved drawings look far better; they have a flowing quality very appropriate to the site. That quality is completely lacking in the new drawings. I hope the Commission fights hard on this; bad design in this great location would be a real shame.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed

See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 
 Top News
  
Recent Comments:  
Westnorth on Bardo Looking to: "Nebulous" is a good word for their plans. "Give me lots of money...
SoChill on Construction Meets Pedestrians: You should at least have a presence on Swizl or TerPSIchord or hotDAMM.
SoChill on Construction Meets Pedestrians: Where's the Storify of all those tweets???
202_cyclist on Construction Meets Pedestrians: GGW has a section where you can submit photos of egregious pedestrian hazards cr...



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
600 B/O VIRGINIA AVE SE   ROBBERY  03/22/15
300 B/O TINGEY ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 03/22/15
500 B/O L ST SE   THEFT
Theft 1st Degree
 03/21/15
50 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 03/10/15
300 B/O L ST SE   MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT
Unauthorized Use Of Vehicle
 03/08/15
700 B/O L ST SE   ROBBERY
Robbery -- Force & Violence
 03/07/15
1300 B/O 4TH ST SE   THEFT
Theft 1 (Theft F/Building)
 03/02/15
70 B/O I ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 03/01/15
100 B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 03/01/15
1000 B/O 5TH ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
Theft From Auto 1
 02/28/15
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 02/28/15
100 B/O K ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
Theft From Auto 1
 02/27/15
1000 B/O 4TH ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 02/27/15

Active Public Space Permits Archive  
No records added or modified in the past two weeks.

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1233 1ST ST SE   
03/25/15 
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC / APS INSPECTIONS
B1403486 / CONSTRUCTION
THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE 1233 1ST ST SE SUBMISSION IS THE CORE AND SHELL ONLY OF A NEW 12 STORY BUILDING. THE APPROXIMATELY 127 200 SF BUILDING IS INTENDED TO BE A HOTEL. THE FUTURE INTERIOR FIT-OUT WILL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY. THE BUILDING WILL SIT ON TOP OF GROUND FLOOR RETAIL / LOBBY LEVEL SUBMITTED AS PART OF A SEPARATE SUBMISSION FOR 1277 1ST ST SE.
1277 1ST ST SE   
03/25/15 
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC / BALL PARK SQUARE LLC
B1403488 / CONSTRUCTION
THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE 1277 1ST ST SE SUBMISSION INCLUDES 2 LEVELS OF BELOW GRADE PARKING TOTALING 370-380 PARKING SPACES A GROUND FLOOR RETAIL / LOBBY / LOADING LEVEL WITH APPROXIMATELY 26 500 SF OF RETAIL AND AN APPROXIMATELY 304 000 SF 13 STORY APARTMENT BUILDING CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 326 UNITS.
1299 1ST ST SE   
03/16/15 
BALL PARK SQUARE LLC / PHYLLIS STEVENS
B1403487 / CONSTRUCTION
THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE 1299 1ST ST SE SUBMISSION IS THE CORE AND SHELL OF A NEW APPROXIMATELY 7 600 SF 2 STORY RETAIL BUILDING WITH A SINGLE BASEMENT LEVEL. THE BUILDING IS INTENDED TO BE A RESTAURANT. THE FUTURE INTERIOR FIT-OUT WILL BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY.
1007 8TH ST SE   
03/10/15 
CALLE OCHO LLC / RALPH THREATT
E1503913 / SUPPLEMENTAL
909 HALF ST SE   
03/26/15 
23 I LLC / WAYNE REEP; 23 I LLC; WAYNE REEP
E37408577 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1015 HALF ST SE   
03/17/15 
BON CHON / PHILIP GODAIRE; BON CHON; PHILIP GODAIRE
P42469697 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/17/15 
EVAN OBRIEN / JOSEPH ABRESCH; EVAN OBRIEN; ROBERT HUNSBERGER
E74054014 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/25/15 
HALF ST SE LLC / GEORGE DELGADO
B1501688 / CONSTRUCTION
INTERIOR ALTERATION TO 3 4 5 FLOORS AND PARTIAL 6TH FLOOR. WORK TO INCLUDE ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING
   
03/25/15 
SAM HOLLEN / GARY MCVEY; SAM HOLLEN; GARY MCVEY
E58849835 / SUPPLEMENTAL
82 I ST SE   
03/17/15 
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC / MITCH A. PERMUY
E1504130 / SUPPLEMENTAL
100 I ST SE   
03/26/15 
NA NA NA
EHOP1590452 / HOME OCCUPATION
300 M ST SE   
03/13/15 
FEDERAL CENTER LP / GREGORY E LIGON
E1504060 / SUPPLEMENTAL
250 M ST SE   
03/12/15 
DAN MCCABE / MICHAEL YASEK
SB1500183 / CONSTRUCTION
FIVE 70-FOOT GEOTECHNICAL SPT SOIL BORINGS WILL BE PERFORMED WITH AN AUGER DRILLING RIG UTILIZING CONTINUOUS FLIGHT HOLLOW STEM AUGERS CREATING APPROXIMATELY 6-INCH DIAMETER BOREHOLES.
300 M ST SE   
03/10/15 
FEDERAL CENTER LP /
P1504050 / SUPPLEMENTAL
909 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
03/16/15 
909 NEW JERSEY AVENUE ACQUISITION LLC / DENNIS LEE WINDSOR
M1501348 / SUPPLEMENTAL
ONE UNIT IS A 10 TON UNIT AND 2 ADDITIONAL UNITS ARE 7.5TONS
   
03/17/15 
909 NEW JERSEY AVENUE ACQUISITION LLC / DAVID L. HAHN
P1504255 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1000 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
03/14/15 
PHILIP BROWN
PC93167082 / POST CARD
REPLACEMENT OF NOT MORE THAN 1 GAS APPLIANCE ON A RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROJECT.
1111 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
03/19/15 
NJA ASSOCIATES LLC / THOMAS P MCGUIRE
E1504215 / SUPPLEMENTAL
25 POTOMAC AVE SE   
03/18/15 
RIVERFRONT HOLDINGS I LLC / GLENNWOOD ROGERS
P1504172 / SUPPLEMENTAL
301 WATER ST SE   
03/13/15 
FOREST CITY / FVI 2020
TL1500054 / CONSTRUCTION
NEW RESTAURANT TENANT LAYOUT AT THE LUMBER SHED PARCEL FOR AN OYSTER BAR WITH 55 INTERIOR SEATS (55 AT 1ST LEVEL AND 30 AT MEZZANINE) 10 STAFF AND 38 OUTDOOR SUMMER GARDEN SEATING.
   
03/13/15 
FC LUMBER SHED LLC / FLACK
TL1500055 / CONSTRUCTION
FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT LOCATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR WITH A TOTAL NUMBER OF SEATS OF 170. INDOORS SEATING IS 86 OUTDOORS SEATING IS 84 ALL OUTDOOR SEATS ARE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 189 WHICH INCLUDES 19 STAFF.
   
03/18/15 
FC LUMBER SHED LLC / SEAN O JOHN
P1504295 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/19/15 
FC LUMBER SHED LLC / DONALD V. ELLENBERGER
M1501405 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
03/20/15 
LUMBER SHED LIC / ROBERT WATTS; LUMBER SHED LIC; ROBERT WATTS
E99575145 / SUPPLEMENTAL
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
1201 HALF ST SE   02/19/15
$ 9,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL II LLC
 
N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0038 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0036 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
R N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0030 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
0032 N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
N ST SE   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
1275 HALF ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
HALF ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
M ST   02/19/15
$ 36,000,000
WEST HALF RESIDENTIAL III LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 1,913,472
BALLPARK HOTEL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 
1ST ST SE   02/10/15
$ 6,600,000
BALLPARK RESIDENTIAL LLC
 


Project Directory




     © Copyright 2015 JD.