Since January, 2003
            
 (a random before-and-after moment)
April 2, 2006
September 9, 2012
3rd Place at L, Looking East-Northeast (see more)

It was a busy ANC 6D meeting on Monday night for Near Southeast-related issues, so I'm going to put it all in a series of posts:
* New Jersey Avenue Underpass Art: The Capitol Riverfront BID gave an update on the "Water Pylons" art installation, which is now moving forward after being "dormant" for about a year. This is the project partially funded by a grant from the DC Commission on Arts and Humanities that will paint and light the pylons holding up the Southeast Freeway in a "modern representation of water that announces New Jersey Avenue, SE as a gateway to the Capitol Riverfront community." The reflective blue paint should go up in July, followed by light fixtures in August, and the installation should be dedicated in September, which will be right around the time that DCCAH moves into its new nearby digs at 225 Virginia/200 I. Passers-by may note that new fences and LED overhead lighting have already been installed along New Jersey as part of the transformation of the underpass. The BID's presentation to the ANC, with more information about the project, is here.
* Parking Parking Parking: There was a discussion about issues with game-day parking in the neighborhood, specifically the prohibition of parking along K and L streets, as well as other restrictions that have made residents unhappy. Damon Harvey of DDOT says that the agency is "reassessing" the current configuration, to figure out how to provide better access to residents while not allowing stadium-goers to then hog all the parking. He expects that changes will be announced in a month or so that will allow for "greater residential protection during games." One other non-game day change for residents has already gone into effect: meters are now turned off at 6:30 pm (but still 10 pm on game days).
However, those who came to the meeting hoping to hear about changes in the Residential Parking Permit system that would allow residents in the high-rise buildings west of Canal Park to park on the street throughout Ward 6 were disappointed, as DDOT continues to hold that large residential buildings in mixed-use neighborhoods will not qualify for RPP. (Harvey used the Ellington on U Street as a specific example of this being the case elsewhere in the city, but there are more buildings in this situation than just that one and the Near Southeast ones.)
Also, in somewhat related news the ANC unanimously passed a resolution protesting the plan in the mayor's new budget to redirect most performance parking proceeds to other areas, such as Metro, rather than their being used as originally intended, to fund non-automotive transportation improvements in the neighborhood.
Comments (11)
   
 
 More About ANC News

JDLand.com Home

Comments

ZoolanderANDtheBoYz says: (5/15/12 10:39 AM)
What's the update on Canal Park Construction?


JD says: (5/15/12 10:44 AM)
That would be what I meant by "series of posts." Not able to get to all of it at once.


202_cyclist says: (5/15/12 11:07 AM)
The Atlantic Cities blog has a great article this morning about the Southeast waterfront neighborhood.

link


Boris says: (5/15/12 11:44 AM)
JD, did they give an "official" reason for this? I mean we all know the city cut some kind of deal with the developers, but what is City Hall saying about it?

"However, those who came to the meeting hoping to hear about changes in the Residential Parking Permit system that would allow residents in the high-rise buildings west of Canal Park to park on the street throughout Ward 6 were disappointed, as DDOT continues to hold that large residential buildings in mixed-use neighborhoods will not qualify for RPP. (Harvey used the Ellington on U Street as a specific example of this being the case elsewhere in the city, but there are more buildings in this situation than just that one and the Near Southeast ones.)"


JD says: (5/15/12 12:03 PM)
It's not a "deal with developers"--it's how parking is handled in a mixed-use area, to prevent every parking space from being perpetually taken by residents, meaning that businesses, restaurants, etc., would have little expectation of visitors being able to park. As I said, there are multiple big apartment buildings in the city where residents don't get RPP stickers. This was a position supported by Tommy Wells when the plans for ballpark-area parking were first laid out, btw.


Boris says: (5/15/12 1:20 PM)
Tommy Wells, wrong again? Say it isn't so. My point is (and then I'll shut up) that renters on or near 7th or 8th get stickers and the same argument could be made in those (commercial) areas of the Hill. And I thought the point of having a metro station in the neighborhood was to discourage people from driving into our area? Lastly, I personally don't want a sticker to park in our neighborhood. I want it to park in those areas of the Hill I can't walk to and have to pay for now. I'll stop now.


Parking4Us says: (5/15/12 2:33 PM)
Our area was built with substantial public and private parking available to ensure that the businesses in the area have visitor/high turnover spots available. It also has an immense amount of street parking available for residential parking. The city however has artificially reduced the number of parking spaces usable by residents in our area which burdens us disproportionately when compared to both existing and potential commercial entities. There probably is not a vast conspiracy between the city and the developers but it certainly does imply they are not paying attention to the REAL needs of the neighborhood as a whole. We want neighborhood visitors to come to the businesses in our area just like the surrounding areas (barracks row, eastern market, etc.) want us to visit theirs. Increasing zone 6 RPP will only increase that commerce in the larger SE, not hinder it. Non-neighborhood visitors will utilize the commercial lots and remaining metered parking anyway so this would not affect them.


Shogungts says: (5/16/12 2:37 PM)
The only meaningful thing that would happen if they expanded RPP to the high rises is that people that live in Capitol Quarter* (and perhaps even some parts north of the highway when other high rises are built) would not have a place to park as they would be flooded with cars from the high rises. Now I am sure there are some examples somewhere, but I can not think of any areas in DC, Arlington, or any other locations which give high rises parking permits for zoned residential areas.

Parking4Us point about other parts of Zone 6 is actually an interesting one, but I imagine it would be quite an ordeal for the city to figure out zoning in that manner. For example, how do they zone so that person A can park in all of zone 6 be except for part 1 (b/c they are in a high rise in part 1) and person B can park in all of zone 6 except for part 2 (b/c they are in a high rise in part 2) and person C can park anywhere in Zone 6 b/c they are in a row house. All of this so you can drive to other parts of Zone 6?

In my opinion, if you live in an high rise, you should plan to secure parking through your building. If your building has a bad parking deal (looking at you Capitol Hill Towers), it is not the city's fault.

*Disclaimer, I do not live in Capitol Quarter.


Shogungts says: (5/16/12 2:40 PM)
As for Boris's comment:

"And I thought the point of having a metro station in the neighborhood was to discourage people from driving into our area?"

It's also to lessen your need for a car.


JD says: (5/16/12 2:45 PM)
... And once you allow Ward 6 parking on more streets in the neighborhood, you'll suddenly find a whole lot more people from Ward 6 driving to baseball games, fighting for the spaces as well. That's one of the reasons that Capitol Quarter people can have trouble finding street parking during games. (It's an issue that the streets just across South Capitol in SW deal with, along with people handing out their Ward 6 guest parking pass to ballpark-goers--all of which takes away parking from residents.)



PJY03 says: (5/16/12 6:27 PM)
We're arguing over two separate things here. Its fairly obvious that there's never going to be enough Zone 6 parking for resident's of high rise buildings to rely on it as their primary parking resource. Even if they opened up a lot more zone 6 parking, you'd have to be out of your mind thinking you could reasonably count on this to meet your residential parking needs. This is why I bought a garage space in my building. You need one if you live here.

So the quantity of parking isn't the issue. I could care less whether they increase the number of zone 6 parking spots available in the neighborhood. I just want the right to the same damn sticker every other tax payer of the ward has. How hard is that? If they have the theoretical right to park in my neighborhood, I should have the right to park in theirs. Its not about opening up more spaces for zone 6 residential parking. Its about treating residents of high rises fairly.

The market will allocate the limited number of spaces efficiently on its own. But you have to treat all city residents fairly.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed


 More News


See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 
 Recent Posts

jdc on CSX East Three-Building: The continuing increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic in JD land requires ...
JES on CSX East Three-Building: That 4th & M light needs updating. They either need to make the left turn ar...
202_cyclist on CSX East Three-Building: Happy Park-ing Day! We met a great group of volunteers setting up wildflowers o...
202_cyclist on CSX East Three-Building: Walt— we saw it as the police were towing away the vehicle. We heard from a bys...
walt on CSX East Three-Building: Any info on the car v. pedestrian accident at Harris Teeter yesterday (9/19)? I...
  
Get JDLand Updates In Your Inbox!



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 09/21/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 09/19/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 09/16/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 09/15/19
70 B/O I ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 09/15/19
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
Shoplifting
 09/13/19
300 B/O M ST SE   MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT
Theft First Degree (Stolen Auto)
 09/13/19
400 B/O L ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 09/11/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Shoplifting
 09/10/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 09/09/19
54 M ST SE   BURGLARY
Burglary Two
 09/07/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 09/05/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Shoplifting
 08/30/19
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 08/28/19
500 B/O M ST SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 08/28/19
800 B/O VIRGINIA AVE SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 08/28/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 08/28/19
500 B/O L ST SE   ROBBERY  08/26/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 08/25/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 08/25/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 08/23/19
300 B/O K ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree - Felony (all Other Larceny)
 08/23/19

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1346 4TH ST SE   
09/11/19 
FC 1346 HOLDCO I LLC / null
E1911472 / SUPPLEMENTAL
900 5TH ST SE   
08/30/19 
CAPPER CARROLLSBURG VENTURES, LLC / DFM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
B1906215 / CONSTRUCTION
Reconstruction of 4-story residential building, the Arthur Capper Senior Center, damaged by fire.
200 I ST SE   
09/04/19 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / ROGER L PEACE
BP1904525 / POST CARD
   
09/04/19 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / ROGER L PEACE
BP1904526 / POST CARD
   
09/04/19 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / ROGER L PEACE
BP1904529 / POST CARD
100 M ST SE 9TH FLOOR   
09/05/19 
SQUARE 743 INC / DAVID FLEMING; DAVID FLEMING
P1909280 / SUPPLEMENTAL
100 M ST SE   
09/05/19 
SQUARE 743 INC / FREDERICK S. DONHAM; FREDERICK S. DONHAM
P1909275 / SUPPLEMENTAL
ONE OPEN SITE DRAIN
250 M ST SE   
08/26/19 
null / ;
P1908962 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
08/27/19 
SQUARE 769 LLC / STEVEN CHEN
AH1901196 / CONSTRUCTION
After hours permit is respectfully requested from 3am to 7am daily.
   
09/04/19 
SQUARE 769 LLC / JEFFREY D WOLF
AH1901226 / CONSTRUCTION
After hours permit respectfully requested from 3 am to 7 am daily.
410 M ST SE   
09/16/19 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY / MICHAEL B. BELL; MICHAEL B. BELL
E1911625 / SUPPLEMENTAL
861 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
08/26/19 
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC / ; N/A; TBD
R1900100 / CONSTRUCTION
RAZE 1 STORY WOOD FRAMED STRUCTURE
880 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
09/20/19 
880 NEW JERSEY AVENUE LLC / PATRICIA J STAUB
BP1904750 / POST CARD
1275 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
09/03/19 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / PARKER HARRELL; PARKER HARRELL
SB1900287 / CONSTRUCTION
We propose to furnish and install fifteen (15) gravel packed wells, fourteen (14) around the perimeter, and one (1) at the elevator pit. We will also be installing 3 monitoring wells and potentially 5 contingency wells. We will only pump from up to 15 wells at a time. All wells will be located in a mutually agreed layout. The wells will be installed by advancing up to a 10.25 I.D. hollow stem auge...
125 O ST SE   
09/13/19 
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA / FRED T FALCONE; JOSEPH SCRIBELLITO
SB1900423 / CONSTRUCTION
Soil borings to collect samples and installed a grouted in place vibrating wire piezometer approximately 30 feet below grade. Two geotechnical soil borings to 75 feet below grade, and 3 soil borings to 20 feet below grade with 5 feet of coring though buried foundations.
301 TINGEY ST SE C-1   
09/03/19 
SEFC 160, LLC / JEFF NOLD
AH1901221 / CONSTRUCTION
Work will occur on 3rd Street SE between Tingey St SE & Water St SE. We will be assessing and providing a CCTV inspection of a sewer line.
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
No commercial transaction records added or modified in the past two weeks.


Project Directory
Completed
Novel South Capitol ('19)
Yards/Guild Apts. ('19)
Capper/The Harlow ('19)
New DC Water HQ ('19)
Yards/Bower Condos ('19)
Virginia Ave. Tunnel ('19)
99 M ('18)
Agora ('18)
1221 Van ('18)
District Winery ('17)
Insignia on M ('17)
F1rst/Residence Inn ('17)
One Hill South ('17)
Homewood Suites ('16)
ORE 82 ('16)
The Bixby ('16)
Dock 79 ('16)
Community Center ('16)
The Brig ('16)
Park Chelsea ('16)
Yards/Arris ('16)
Hampton Inn ('15)
Southeast Blvd. ('15)
11th St. Bridges ('15)
Parc Riverside ('14)
Twelve12/Yards ('14)
Lumber Shed ('13)
Boilermaker Shops ('13)
Camden South Cap. ('13)
Canal Park ('12)
Capitol Quarter ('12)
225 Virginia/200 I ('12)
Foundry Lofts ('12)
1015 Half Street ('10)
Yards Park ('10)
Velocity Condos ('09)
Teague Park ('09)
909 New Jersey Ave. ('09)
55 M ('09)
100 M ('08)
Onyx ('08)
70/100 I ('08)
Nationals Park ('08)
Seniors Bldg Demo ('07)
400 M ('07)
Douglass Bridge Fix ('07)
US DOT HQ ('07)
20 M ('07)
Capper Seniors 1 ('06)
Capitol Hill Tower ('06)
Courtyard/Marriott ('06)
Marine Barracks ('04)


Overviews
Capper/Carrollsburg
Anacostia Riverwalk
New Jersey Avenue
M Street
South Capitol Street
The Yards
Lower 8th Street
East M Street
Boathouse Row





                  © Copyright 2019 JD.