Since January, 2003
            
 (a random before-and-after moment)
August 14, 2005
January 6, 2019
1st at I, Looking West-Northwest (see more)

The apartment projects F1rst and the as-yet-unnamed building at 909 Half aren't even waiting to be topped out before starting to put their faces on:
There's also now plenty of windows on the Homewood Suites at 50 M, where there is clearly No Time To Lose if they are going to make that October 2016 opening date on the signage. And I bet there will be some windows on Insignia on M before too much longer.
I've also posted updated photos of Agora, ORE 82, the Bixby, and Dock 79, in addition to new shots at the links above.
And there's lots of Slider updates, too, a few of which are previewed below.
Comments (30)
   
 
 More About F1rst Residential/Hotel

JDLand.com Home

Comments

jdc says: (4/20/16 8:13 AM)
Seeing Homewood Suite's progress every day has somewhat blinded me to its progress. But I only see Insignia on M every few weeks, and man that thing is moving fast now. It's also become clear just how hulking its presence will be. I sort of like how Half St. will have tiered buildings, which will make Half very inviting going towards ballpark.


MJM says: (4/20/16 9:21 AM)
Those windows at 909 are something else. Seems a bit odd to have all windows - hope they invest in some blinds.


SWag says: (4/20/16 9:50 AM)
I've heard complaints that the Navy Yard feels unusually boxy and has no character. Every building is virtually the same. Thoughts?


JES says: (4/20/16 10:01 AM)
Certainly it's boxy; that was to be expected with the height limits. developers will naturally try to squeeze as much square footage onto every lot, which leads to boxy buildings. But as for everything looking the same, I don't really understand that viewpoint. Does Velocity look like Parc Riverside? Do either of them look super glassy like 909 Half? Does anything in the whole neighborhood look like Arris? Makes no sense to me.


JES says: (4/20/16 10:03 AM)
@MJM, yeah, the exterior of that building looks more like a glassy office building than a residential building. Odd choice, but some people like a ton of natural light, so I'm sure it'll still fill up.

@JD, we still don't have any idea how much retail square footage 909 will have, do we?


GoNavy says: (4/20/16 10:04 AM)
So the Bixby's land is still owned by the DCHA correct? Is there going to be a salary cap for the residents there or is the leasing process just going to be normal? I guess I am unclear on what mixed-income means.


JD says: (4/20/16 10:37 AM)
Mixed income means some market-rate units, no income cap on those, then some affordable units that you have to qualify for based on your income or lack thereof.


JNB says: (4/20/16 11:46 AM)
Everything is a box because developers are using the density that they are given. IE FAR. With land costs and construction costs as high as they are and the height limits in place it leaves little room for architects to have the imagination that they have in other cities. When you go through a PUD you have a little more room to play around with the shape.


jdc says: (4/20/16 11:50 AM)
I generally think that the buildings here do tend to stick our from one another in terms of their cladding. Some have lots of glass, some have more brick or other opaque cladding. And some are square, some are more rectangular, etc, based on the parcels and street configuration. Overall, I think it's pretty visually interesting and only going to be more interesting once Half St. and 1st are finished. Those two corridors are really going to make things pop.


SWag says: (4/20/16 11:53 AM)
I want to go on record as saying - I for one freaking love the Navy Yard, but to play devil's advocate - sure we all know WHY developers build boxy buildings, but does that change the fact that ALL of Navy Yard is pretty much big, max story, square buildings with a little brick here, a little glass there. Does the neighborhood seem to be missing a "soul" per say? Is it somewhere you can see yourself long term, or is it only cool if you're a millennial?


CJBabyDaddy says: (4/20/16 12:16 PM)
What, pray tell (pun intended), defines a neighborhood's "soul"? And who gets to judge whether that "soul" is inevitably going to neighborhood heaven or hell? Do we judge a neighborhood's "soul" at birth? What if a neighborhood never accepts JDLand as its Lord and Savior, but spends its entire existence doing good deeds?


MarkinDC says: (4/20/16 12:31 PM)
I agree with SWag. Walk around other parts of DC (except maybe NOMA) and you'll see a healthy mix of co-ops, store fronts, row houses, un-imposing apartment buildings, etc with office buildings mixed in at the right scale. Navy Yard, as much as I love to call it home, is beginning to feel like a bunch of massive boxes with little to no creativity - kind of feeling like Clarendon.


JD says: (4/20/16 12:39 PM)
As I've mentioned before, this would have been a discussion to have before 160+ buildings were demolished.


jdc says: (4/20/16 1:56 PM)
Menu for top of the yards: link


SWag says: (4/20/16 2:25 PM)
@JD - I don't think it's too late to step back and add some character. Now who would be willing to give up their share of the pie to make it happen is another question.


DCisforLovers says: (4/20/16 3:04 PM)
My 2 cents is that I feel that the Navy Yard is really like no other legitimate "big name" neighborhood in DC (NoMa probably being closest as it becomes more modern), being as it has always been much different than other more established areas of the city. This place used to be an absolute DUMP. I believe they attempted to maintain as much "original" character as they could with the renovation of the Boilermaker shops and the Lumber Shed and I hope with the old historic DC Water building and the old Navy Yard building next to Harris Teeter. Everything else was dilapidated row homes and bus depots, which deserved to be demolished. Nothing fancy like the historic row homes/buildings of Georgetown or Downtown existed around here. With an extremely modern marvel (literally) of a Ballpark built, it only makes sense to follow suit with a more modern feel to the buildings around it. I personally love it.


202_cyclist says: (4/20/16 3:14 PM)
I don't know--- I don't think the neighborhood is too boxy (i.e. Clarendon or NOMA). The Arris building is certainly unique, as is Park Chelsea with its deco architecture and sandstone color. JBG's residential building on Half Street is going to be great architecture and the DC Water headquarters will be nice modern, distinct, building. Add in the EYA rowhouses and I think the neighborhood has a good amount of variation.


Edna says: (4/21/16 8:53 AM)
Clarendon boxy? Huh? I don't see that at all.


conngs0 says: (4/21/16 10:03 AM)
This has been an interesting discussion to follow inasmuch as I can see the rationale for many conflicting opinions (i.e. too boxy vs. plenty of architectural diversity).

I can stand in certain parts of the neighborhood (e.g. 1st and L) and think that there are too many buildings of similar size (I guess my taste isn't sophisticated enough to be amazed by different facades, brick color, architectural nuances like fancy trellises, etc.).

However, one doesn't have to walk more than a couple of blocks to find completely different perspectives that includes townhouses, parks, the Anacostia River (with the Navy Yard, and now a marina along with a number of waterfront restaurants), etc.

There's also a time element to the equation. The neighborhood has a totally different feel on game days. Some might say that it's sleepy on days when the Nats aren't playing, but I personally enjoy the alternation between the tranquil atmosphere and the infusion of energy (I guess I could do without the Taylor Swift concerts at Nats Park, but even then I suppose the one night per year of screaming eleven year olds helps me appreciation the tranquility of those other nights even more!).

Lastly, the neighborhood isn't even finished yet. Wasn't it only last year that it surpassed the 50 percent mark for completed projects? So given all that, I don't expect a core identity to be established for quite some time. Regardless, I find it to be a very exciting place to be and am very grateful for the opportunity to live here.


JES says: (4/21/16 10:08 AM)
The other thing regarding "boxy" stuff is that while architecture is nice, what "makes" a neighborhood pleasant is what people can see and interact with on the street level. From that perspective, we're doing quite well, given that almost every new building going up is going to have at least one retail bay. We also have one thing that no other DC neighborhood does (the ballpark and the atmosphere that comes with it as conngs0 mentions above), and one thing that very few do (an extensive waterfront). "Boxy" architecture aside, those two things will go a long way towards making the neighborhood feel unique even if some feel the architecture is too bland.


JES says: (4/21/16 10:10 AM)
I totally overused the double quotes in that post. And for that, I apologize :-)


SWag says: (4/21/16 10:31 AM)
Again, just for discussion's sake - I will say, the Navy Yard could really benefit from small-scale, infill development. 15 unit buildings, more single or two story retail buildings, smaller buildings all together, etc. It seems like every building is mixed-use and mammoth (I would also say boxy, but I guess I get that).


JES says: (4/21/16 12:06 PM)
SWag, I don't really disagree. But, with land values so high, I'm just trying to explain why it won't ever happen, at least north of M and west of Canal Park. The Yards itself does have some smaller structures (i.e., boilermaker, lumber shed, future park retail pavilions, eventual movie theater won't be 14 stories either I don't think), but like JD said earlier, that ship sailed back during the "land rush" after the ballpark announcement. Nothing to do now but accept it.


jdc says: (4/21/16 12:35 PM)
I'd say the height is actually pretty limited to a few corridors. The entire townhouse segment is 'short', the new community center and school are 'short', the area around Yards Park is 'short' and low density, and there are still other segments that will be filled in (new building housing the winery) that won't be 10+ stories.


walt says: (4/21/16 2:48 PM)
Good points all around. Another block that could have been a massive behemoth, but that is turning out to be really nice looking for a giant residential apartment building, is the Bixby. They gave up some square footage to gain a really nice looking building that fits in with the neighborhood and from the outside, could pass for rowhouses.


JD says: (4/24/16 9:24 PM)
I've been out of town for a few days, but I'm back now. As for when that will translate into new content here, well, we'll see. :)


202_cyclist says: (4/25/16 1:40 PM)
Any update for when the Brig will open? It looks like it could be finished any day now. They missed a great weekend for drinking good beer this past weekend.

Also, what is the Nats magic number to win the NL East? That was quite a game yesterday!


JD says: (4/25/16 1:44 PM)
I haven't heard anything on the Brig one way or the other, though at this point it may be dependent on final city inspections, and, well....


conngs0 says: (4/25/16 3:37 PM)
202, the Nats have been super fun to watch this month, but I'm going to wait to see how they handle their May schedule before allowing myself to be too giddy about a possible NL East title.

However, I'm sticking with my 91-71 (with NL East title!) prediction. Maybe I'll have to revise that upwards if the Nats have a .500 record in May and enter June in good health though!


Westnorth says: (5/9/16 10:51 PM)
Anyplace that develops all at once will look pretty uniform, and especially a high-rise area in DC. There are only so many ways of designing a big and wide box, especially if it's all architects from the same general era working with the same materials. A compounding factor: most of the parcel sizes in Near SE are large (with a few great exceptions, like Lot 38!). The buildings were old warehouses on lots of land, and the economics of building here mean that most everything has to be a high-rise, and a relatively wide high-rise at that.

Neighborhoods that have more architectural character usually have not just a wider variety of buildings, but more buildings in general -- they have smaller parcel sizes, and were built in several waves over centuries. In DC, though, the practice is that once a neighborhood is built, it's soon frozen in time through historic designation. (You think it's just Georgetown or Capitol Hill, but no, even Eckington and Southwest could soon be historic districts!) Then, a different part of town is torn down, built up all at once, and the process repeats itself.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed


 More News


See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 
 Recent Posts

202_cyclist on Assault Outside Scarlet: Senator Schumer had a nice tribute to the gentleman who was the victim of the as...
202_cyclist on Assault Outside Scarlet: Senator Schumer had a nice tribute to the gentleman who was the victim of the as...
CJBabyDaddy on Nom News: Oh well, there goes my plan for a return to the svelte bod of my youth this summ...
dcgent on Catching Up with: Fried chicken place taking Justin's Cafe spot https://dc.eater.com/2019/5/21/18...
JES on Catching Up with: Justin's replacement is official: https://www.washingtonian.com/2019/05/21/roy-b...
dcgent on Catching Up with: More on Bruner-Yang's cafe https://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2019/05/2...
  
Get JDLand Updates In Your Inbox!



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 05/17/19
500 B/O L ST SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 05/17/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree - Felony (all Other Larceny)
 05/17/19
1100 SOUTH CAPITOL ST SE   ROBBERY
Assault W/i To Commit Robbery (simple Assault)
 05/16/19
1000 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 05/15/19
300 K ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 05/14/19
70 B/O I ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 05/12/19
1100 B/O 1ST ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 05/11/19
200 B/O K ST SE   ROBBERY  05/11/19
300 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 05/10/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 05/08/19
1300 B/O 4TH ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 05/08/19
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Building)
 05/01/19
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 04/29/19
1500 B/O SOUTH CAPITOL ST   THEFT
Theft First Degree (theft From Building)
 04/26/19
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 04/25/19
300 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 04/25/19
1200 B/O HALF ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 04/24/19
50 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 04/23/19
900 B/O M ST SE   THEFT FROM AUTO
Theft 2nd Degree (theft From Motor Vehicle)
 04/23/19
1100 B/O 1ST ST SE   ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON  04/22/19
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 04/22/19
UNIT B/O I ST SE   THEFT
Theft 2nd Degree (all Other Larceny)
 04/21/19

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1100 2ND PL SE   
04/30/19 
CBRE / HELEN M MAPPLEBECK
TL1900080 / CONSTRUCTION
First generation finish out of Suite #100 at Square 769N Building, first floor for a 1,374 SF hair salon
   
05/17/19 
CAPPER 769N CONDOMINIUM / WILLIAM J. ANDERSON
P1906344 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1331 4TH ST SE CU   
05/01/19 
FC 1331 LLC / BEN BEDDO; BEN BEDDO
SG1900282 / CONSTRUCTION
INSTALL WALL MOUNTED BLADE SIGN WITH EXTERNAL ILLUMINATION. SIGN DOES NOT ENCROACH PUBLIC SPACE.
   
05/09/19 
FC 1331 LLC / BEN BEDDO
B1908465 / CONSTRUCTION
INSTALLATION OF RESTAURANT SUMMER GARDEN WITHIN PROPERTY LINE.
1331 4TH ST SE R-2   
04/29/19 
FC 1331 LLC / ALAN W. CARTER
E1906870 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
04/29/19 
FC 1331 LLC / ALAN W. CARTER
E1906871 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1017 4TH ST SE   
05/17/19 
MIKE MORAWSKI / KYLE YOST; KYLE YOST
SOL1901148 / CONSTRUCTION
rooftop solar pv system, less than 4' above roof
1346 4TH ST SE   
04/26/19 
FC 1346 HOLDCO I LLC / JAMES CRONENBERG
TL1900035 / CONSTRUCTION
TENANT LAYOUT NEW RESTAURANT ON GROUND FLOOR TENANT SPACE, IN EXISTING MIXED-USE BUILDING (5,024 SQ. FT. TENANT) NO CHANGES TO BUILDING EGRESS SYSTEM. NO CHANGES TO BUILDING FOOTPRINT. NO CHANGES TO BUILDING STRUCTURE.
300 M ST SE 1ST FL 20024   
04/24/19 
FEDERAL CENTER LPCHARLESE SMITH #1100 / MARK A. PELUSO
E1906747 / SUPPLEMENTAL
300 M ST SE 880/8TH FL 20024   
04/24/19 
FEDERAL CENTER LP CHARLESE SMITH #1100 / MARK A. PELUSO
E1906750 / SUPPLEMENTAL
300 M ST SE 20024   
04/24/19 
FEDERAL CENTER LP CHARLESE SMITH #1100 / MARK A. PELUSO
E1906749 / SUPPLEMENTAL
880 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
04/29/19 
880 NEW JERSEY AVE LLC / null
M1902401 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
05/02/19 
880 NEW JERSEY AVENUE LLC / null
M1902440 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE 7TH FL 20590   
05/13/19 
JBG/FEDERAL CENTER LLC / null
P1906172 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE 7TH 20590   
05/01/19 
JBG/ FEDERAL CENTER LIC / null
P1905855 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1100 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
05/02/19 
SQUARE 742, LLC / SAM HOLLEN; NA
B1909008 / CONSTRUCTION
INTERIOR RENOVATION TO 6TH FLOOR OFFICE SPACE. DEMISING PARTITIONS, FURNITURE, MECHANICAL , ELECTRICAL AND LIFE SAFETY. 980 SQUARE FEET. ALION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE 20590   
05/09/19 
JBG/FEDERAL CENTER LLC / CARLOS E. MONTES
P1906111 / SUPPLEMENTAL
79 POTOMAC AVE SE   
05/08/19 
RIVERFRONT HOLDINGS I LLC / null
E1907222 / SUPPLEMENTAL
227 TINGEY ST SE   
04/24/19 
JOHN MORIARTY & ASSOCIATES / DFM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
AH1900819 / CONSTRUCTION
Yards Parcel L-2. Afterhours permit for the purpose of trash removal.
   
05/10/19 
FOREST CITY WASHINGTON / DFM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
B1909472 / CONSTRUCTION
First Extension to B1801871, to Expire on 11 / 25 / 2019. Original Scope: Yards Parcel L-2. New 11-story mixed use building with residential, retail on ground level, and underground parking garage. TPR. 6-month extension of permit B1801871.
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
No commercial transaction records added or modified in the past two weeks.


Project Directory
Completed
Yards/Guild Apts. ('19)
Capper/The Harlow ('19)
New DC Water HQ ('19)
Yards/Bower Condos ('19)
Virginia Ave. Tunnel ('19)
99 M ('18)
Agora ('18)
1221 Van ('18)
District Winery ('17)
Insignia on M ('17)
F1rst/Residence Inn ('17)
One Hill South ('17)
Homewood Suites ('16)
ORE 82 ('16)
The Bixby ('16)
Dock 79 ('16)
Community Center ('16)
The Brig ('16)
Park Chelsea ('16)
Yards/Arris ('16)
Hampton Inn ('15)
Southeast Blvd. ('15)
11th St. Bridges ('15)
Parc Riverside ('14)
Twelve12/Yards ('14)
Lumber Shed ('13)
Boilermaker Shops ('13)
Camden South Cap. ('13)
Canal Park ('12)
Capitol Quarter ('12)
225 Virginia/200 I ('12)
Foundry Lofts ('12)
1015 Half Street ('10)
Yards Park ('10)
Velocity Condos ('09)
Teague Park ('09)
909 New Jersey Ave. ('09)
55 M ('09)
100 M ('08)
Onyx ('08)
70/100 I ('08)
Nationals Park ('08)
Seniors Bldg Demo ('07)
400 M ('07)
Douglass Bridge Fix ('07)
US DOT HQ ('07)
20 M ('07)
Capper Seniors 1 ('06)
Capitol Hill Tower ('06)
Courtyard/Marriott ('06)
Marine Barracks ('04)


Overviews
Capper/Carrollsburg
Anacostia Riverwalk
New Jersey Avenue
M Street
South Capitol Street
The Yards
Lower 8th Street
East M Street
Boathouse Row





                  © Copyright 2019 JD.