Since January, 2003
 (a random before-and-after moment)
January 22, 2006
May 1, 2010
4th at I, Looking North (see more)

On January 7, the city and federal agencies working on the various Anacostia Waterfront projects held their first "Interagency Coordinating Council" briefing of 2009, and were kind enough to post the PowerPoint slides (28 MB!) at theanacostiawaterfront.com. A number of Near Southeast projects are part of this domain, including South Capitol Street, the Frederick Douglass Bridge, and the 11th Street Bridges. Let's start with South Capitol Street, where the final designs for the reconfiguration of South Capitol Street (under the South Capitol Street EIS) appear to have been chosen (the "Final EIS Preferred Alternative"):
* The top headline is that the new Douglass Bridge is apparently going to be an arched bascule design (like the Memorial Bridge), with an opening span to allow for larger vessels to sail through.
* There will be a large traffic oval at the foot of the new bridge (which will be located to the south of the current bridge), reshaping the intersection of South Capitol Street and Potomac Avenue. (The ballpark's Home Plate Gate and entrance promenade will be the northeast edge of the oval.)
* The intersection of South Capitol Street and M Street will become an at-grade intersection (no more underpass for through traffic).
* There will be modifications to South Capitol's interchange with the SE/SW Freeway. They aren't specified in this document, but based on my previous readings of the Draft EIS, I believe the final design will remove the existing ramp that begins at I Street with an at-grade intersection underneath the freeway that would have two left-turn lanes to a new ramp. With the removal of the existing ramp to I-395, the intersection at South Capitol and I would also be reconfigured.
* The northern section of South Capitol Street will match the reconfigured portion between N Street and Potomac Avenue, as a six-lane boulevard with a median and wide sidewalks.
* They expect to get a Record of Decision on the Final EIS from the Feds this fall. There's nothing in this document about a start date.
(Hopefully I'll find out more about the final EIS at Tuesday's ANC 6B meeting, so look for additional details on all of this in the coming days.)
As for the 11th Street Bridges, the file says that a demolition contract will be awarded this month for the decommissioned ramps to and from RFK, with the work expected to take place this spring. As for the big work to reconstruct the bridges, the city expects to choose a design/build team and have a contract with them by June 1, with the entire project slated to be completed by the end of 2013.
The PDF also has quick updates on the Anacostia Streetcar Project, the MLK Great Streets Initiative, the Anacostia Riverwalk Trail, the Parkside Pedestrian Bridge in Ward 7, and a new traffic circle at Pennsylvania and Potomac avenues. It's also got some good general bullet points on the South Capitol and 11th Street projects if you haven't been following up to now. I just hope you have a high-speed connection to download the entire 28-MB file. Otherwise, go get some lunch.
UPDATE: I've taken a little time to give both my South Capitol Street and Douglass Bridge pages a makeover with the new information (and boy, they needed it)--there's now some graphics pinched from the Draft EIS that do a better job explaining what the future plans are. I'd also suggest reading the executive summary of the 2008 Draft EIS, with the knowledge that most of the Design Alternative #2 options apparently have been chosen for the final design. It's a fair amount of detail, but worth it if you want to know how the project has reached its current state, and what's coming in the future. As I said, more to come as the city briefs neighborhoods and groups on the final EIS.
Comments (0)
 
 More About Douglass Bridge

JDLand.com Home

Comments

IMGoph says: (1/9/09 11:48 AM)
it's not ugly, but it sure as hell isn't daring. uber-conservative DC strikes again.


JD says: (1/9/09 11:51 AM)
Yeah, well, it's the one that I threw my considerable power and influence behind, so I'm happy:

link

:-)



F says: (1/9/09 12:59 PM)
Can't wait to drive across the JD Arched Bascule Bridge (JDABB).


jayd says: (1/9/09 2:08 PM)
Ugh, ANOTHER safe, none-iconic piece of beige architecture for the city.


MJM says: (1/9/09 3:46 PM)
They could have used a more modern look to match the stadium look/feel but this bridge keeps with tradition (Memorial Bridge).

Good have gone either way


BC says: (1/9/09 5:01 PM)
I am very happy with this selection. Modern design makes me think of Tampa or Miami. When I moved to New England and then later to DC, I became a traditional archetecture convert. DC has such beautiful traditional buildings: Treasure Dept, Old Post Office Pov, Natural History Museum, Union Station, Building Museum and so many more. It is a shame that the stadium could not follow these examples. But at least the bridge will (sort of) follow it. It would have been nice if they could have put on a brownstone or marble facade instead. But hay, I will take this as a small victory anyway.


BC says: (1/9/09 5:13 PM)
I forgot to mention that I hope the S. Capitol St. rendering with grass and trees where Florida Rock office/residential buildings should be is not a sign. Oh, and sorry for misspelling architecture above.


JD says: (1/9/09 5:24 PM)
Considering that Florida Rock can't even start that western portion of their project until the new bridge is built and the old one is demolished (since the current bridge runs across that footprint), maybe this rendering is just realistic. :-)


drewstewart says: (1/10/09 5:06 AM)
So your 'old school' wish for a "G'Town"design of new Douglas Bridge (boring bascule vs. unique Golden Gate suspension) wins the competition! SNORE. (You need to dare for your old neighborhood!)

But no matter what I think, because I've been somewhat disappointed that you've never taken your unique neighborhood leadership position to lead a 'progressive design movement' to encourage developers to rebuild SE into a "landmark" of architectural design. (to date: (imo) ABSOLUTELY NONE of the new SE buildings are anything more than "so-so" architecture). Whether you agree or not, I believe only you can lead a movement to correct this.

I realize I am being hard on your previous excellent work. But, in reality, you are the neo-mayor of the new SE, so you must accept this criticism.





F says: (1/10/09 8:51 AM)
It's important to note that many of the new SE buildings are leaders in environmental design. Many of them will be LEED certified (either silver or gold), something very much in demand by large tenants these days.


JD says: (1/10/09 10:45 AM)
Hi, Drew:

I actually have no problem with your criticism, because people who want me to lead a "movement" of some type or another (you're not only not the first, you're not the first *this week*) don't see the forest for the trees, and that's this:

Whatever "influence" people think I might have--which realistically is, um, ZERO--is because I've worked very hard over these six years to not have a public opinion on most projects and controversies. This is because a) I was worried my employer would fire me and b) I feared that taking stands would lessen my ability to get news and information from the many different people and entities out there, which is my mission above all else.

Most of these people have no real reason (especially when I first got started) to pay any attention to me, and if I had asked for information or renderings and then blasted their designs or plans, that most likely would have been the last time I got anything out of them. If other people have opinions (in the comments, or news stories, or wherever), I have no problem with that, but if I had been a gadfly from the beginning, it's likely that this site wouldn't be anything like it is today; I'd be depending on news stories and public documents, but little else. (Sometimes I think people don't quite grasp the amount of original reporting that goes into JDLand.) And, once you start having opinions, it becomes easier for someone who disagrees with you to start dismissing everything you say or write as being "slanted."

I can tell you that about four years ago (before many people had ever seen the site), I tried to talk to a principal architect after an ANC meeting to get some information about a project in the Hood, and when I introduced myself as a blogger, he immediately shut me down, made a few cracks about how I must be complaining about how awful everything is, and walked away. If that was the reaction when I *wasn't* advocating, imagine what it would be if I *were.* (So I got a big kick out of it recently when this same architect was in a group of people I was talking to, and when he found out I was the writer of JDLand.com, he had all sorts of great things to say, clearly not remembering our earlier encounter. Nyaah!)

There's also a developer of a current project who's miffed at me because they think I *linked* to a negative story about them (a link which for the life of me I can't find), and because I told them that even if I could find the link, I wouldn't take it down, since it was a legitimate news story. So, what I do is a bit of a minefield even when I try to play it straight down the middle.

I can guarantee people that I have a lot of strong feelings about what goes on in the Hood. (Just ask my husband, who has to listen to all of them.) There's buildings I can't stand, boneheaded government decisions that I think are totally wrong, and silly ideas that I hope get gobbled up by the economy. But the second I start talking about those, I lose everything that got the site to where it is now. And what I want the site to be is a place where people can find out what they need to know about Near Southeast. (With, granted, some carping every so often about bureaucracy or media coverage.)

Besides, in this era of everyone having an opinion about everything all the time, isn't it nice coming to an "oasis" of old-school just-the-facts? :-)

There you have it, the JDLand Manifesto!

PS: For the record (since it's the one design I did spout off about and since the decision's now been made), the reason I couldn't go for the cable stayed swing bridge, apart from not being a big fan of its profile, is that the pedestrian and bike paths have to be in the center of the bridge, as opposed to on the edges. What's the point of having a grand promenade across a waterway between what will eventually be two large neigbhorhoods if you can't stop and spend some time looking over the side at the water and the shorelines? In a city where so many people are so big on "walkability" and cycling improvements, I would think this would be vastly preferred to being surrounded by six lanes of traffic whizzing by at 50 mph.



phoenixdc says: (1/10/09 12:43 PM)
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRR
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRINN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!

As a native Washingtonian and someone who had been at the earliest meetings on this bridge I am not surprised at the choice....
Cowards!!!!!


jamie dillon says: (1/10/09 6:07 PM)
Way to go JD. I preferred the other design but I still read your site almost daily because of the "oasis" effect. We (society at large) are inundated by so much information we have become lazy and prefer pundits to deliver news AND opinion as a package. And thusly, even in the most premiere forums, we have lost our journalistic objectiveness replaced by a lack of creativity and commercialized fear.

Opinions are like.... and I come here for the straight dope. Your credibility and vigilance over several years has made your opinion worthwhile and big fans out of many of us.

Further, if others were as dedicated, articulate, and quietly passionate about their own endeavors as you, we'd all be far better off.


Michael says: (1/10/09 7:45 PM)
Keep up the excellent work JD. Your site is a far better design than that of the new cookie cutter buildings going up in our hood! The quality of the reporting is far superior to the modern construction as well, I daresay.


MJM says: (1/11/09 11:32 AM)
I didn't realize a bridge could stir the pot so much. Maybe they should have built a tunnel instead.

Plus I didn't think this turned into a referndum on JDLand.

If it weren't JD, I don't think I'd be moving to SE later this year or at all. She peaked my interest in the area and really seems to have the only (positive/neutral) news about the area because there is only negative about SE from the Times, Post or City Paper.


F says: (1/11/09 9:40 PM)
I currently live in SE and will be moving to another place in SE later this year, mainly due to the information I've received from JDLand. This impartial, informative and innovative forum has been invaluable in keeping the public updated and motivated. The succesful transformation of SE DC is largely due to the dedicated reporting in JDLand.


Chris Loos says: (1/11/09 11:58 PM)
The presentation says they wanted an "architecturally significant" structure, yet they chose the one that looks exactly like the Memorial Bridge.

Way to innovate DC.


JNo says: (1/13/09 11:18 AM)
I echo your sentiment Chris. DC is so "safe", ugh.

Dear DC-- you never fail to dissapoint. PS-you are killing my mojo.

Add a Comment:

Comments are closed for this post.

JDLand Comments RSS Feed

See All Current News Items | Full Blog Archive

 
 Top News
  
Recent Comments:  
Westnorth on BID Annual Meeting: The Office of Planning mentioned something about large-format retail during the ...
58Model on Van Ness School: But that may threaten our status as a school free gun zone...
ScoopDC on CSX Gets Tunnel: CSX has been laying the temporary tracks for this project for about two months n...
JD on Tuesday Tidbits: I'm guessing when he reaches the end of the lineup on the blog (which is conside...



City Government Data for Near Southeast Records added or updated recently displayed here; click the "archive" links to see additional detail and older records. All data from DC Government databases and RSS feeds. JDLand takes no responsibility for errors, omissions, etc. (read CapStat disclaimer). Data is retrieved daily.

Recent Crime Incidents Archive  
1300 B/O M ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
Theft From Auto 1
 01/27/15
1200 B/O 4TH ST SE   THEFT
Theft 1st Degree
 01/26/15
70 B/O I ST SE   SEX ABUSE
2nd Degree Sexual Abuse
 01/25/15
1000 B/O 8TH ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 01/25/15
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
Theft 2 (Theft F/Building)
 01/22/15
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 01/20/15
400 B/O M ST SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 01/19/15
1000 B/O 7TH ST SE   ASSAULT W/DANGEROUS WEAPON
Adw -- Knife
 01/15/15
1100 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT
2nd Degree
 01/12/15
1000 B/O NEW JERSEY AVE SE   THEFT F/AUTO
 01/12/15
1100 B/O 5TH ST SE   THEFT F/AUTO
Theft From Auto 1
 01/05/15

Active Public Space Permits Archive  
1331 2ND ST SE    Carlton Ray 
Assigned
paving; streetfixture; excavation  
 02/10/14
to
02/09/15
1331 4TH ST SE    Forest City Forest City 
Issued
excavation; new  
 01/10/14
to
02/10/15

Recent Issued Building Permits Archive  
1025 1ST ST SE   
01/13/15 
FRANCISCA OTERO
PC52706432 / POST CARD
INSTALLATION OF NOT MORE THAN 1 NEW AIR CONDITIONING UNIT UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 10-TONS OF EQUIVALENT REFRIGERATING EFFECT.
801 2ND ST SE   
01/22/15 
BAKER DC LLC / CHRISTINE LONG
AH1500209 / CONSTRUCTION
AN AFTER HOURS PERMIT IS RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED FORM 7:00 PM THRU 7:00AM
1201 4TH ST SE   
01/13/15 
JGB/FEDERAL CENTER LLC / JIM CALABRESE
AN1500018 / CONSTRUCTION
REPLACE 10 EXISTING ANTENNAS WITH 10 NEW ANTENNAS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ANTENNAS PER SECTOR / MOUNT WILL NOT EXCEED 5 PER DCRA CODE. THEREFORE NO OFFICE PLANNING LETTER IS REQUIRED. AS PER PLANS AS PER CODE.
1240 12TH ST SE   
01/14/15 
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICE / ERIKA FERGERSON - CARROLL
B1503361 / CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR TO PLACE CONSTRUCTION TRAILER ON PRIVATE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1240 12TH ST SE PROPERTY.
1015 HALF ST SE   
01/30/15 
HALF ST SE LLC / SAM HOLLEN RAMCO OF DC INC.
TL1500016 / CONSTRUCTION
INTERIOR TENANT LAYOUT OF OFFICE SPACE AND RADIO STUDIOS ON THE 2ND FLOOR. PARTITIONS FURNITURE EQUIPMENT MEP AND LIFE SAFETY WORK. INSTALL 2000 GALLON DOUBLE-WALL CONTAINMENT ABOVE GROUND FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK ON B2 LEVEL. CBS BROADCAST STUDIOS
82 I ST SE   
01/23/15 
RUSSELL WHITWORTH GREYSTONE / SHELDON WILLIAMS WILES MENSCH CORP; RUSSELL WHITWORTH
BCIV1400098 / CONSTRUCTION
RELOCATE A 12 INCH WATER LINE THIS SUMMER.
100 I ST SE   
01/24/15 
NA NA NA
EHOP1590258 / HOME OCCUPATION
125 L ST SE   
01/12/15 
SOK C REED ANN'S BEAUTY SUPPLY & WIG CO / PAPA-KWESI COLEMAN
B1501967 / CONSTRUCTION
CONVERTING A PORTION OF EXISTING BEAUTY SALON TO OFFICE FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PURPOSES.
20 M ST SE   
01/12/15 
SOUTHEAST REALTY LLC / JOHN GIUSEPPE-RAMCO
TL1500021 / CONSTRUCTION
REVISION TO PLANS AND PERMIT TL1400132 SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOP AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED ARCH ELECTRICAL PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL DWGS. AND WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES BEING MADE. INTERIOR WORK ONLY. NO STRUCTURAL WORK INVOLVED. NO CHANGE IN SEATING CAPACITY STAYING AT 41.
50 M ST SE   
01/26/15 
ENGLEWOOD LLC / FVI 2020
SH1400087 / CONSTRUCTION
SHEETING AND SHORING ACTIVITIES RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOTEL 11 ABOVE GRADE 1 STORY BELOW GRADE 195 HOTEL SUITES
100 M ST SE   
01/20/15 
SQUARE 743 INC / JOHN MCDONALD
P1502784 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
01/14/15 
SQUARE 743 INC / MATTHEW WERT
P1502642 / SUPPLEMENTAL
   
01/20/15 
SQUARE 743 INC. / SAM HOLLEN RAMCO OF DC INC.
B1503542 / CONSTRUCTION
INTERIOR RENOVATION FOR 7TH FLOOR TENANT CORRIDOR. PARTITIONS DOORS MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL AND LIFE SAFETY.
861 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
01/28/15 
CSX TRANSPORTATION / CSX TRANSPORTATION; INTERAGENCY CONSULTANTS; ; JUSTIN DONNELLY
BCIV1400064 / CONSTRUCTION
THE VIRGINIA AVENUE TUNNEL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WILL MODIFY THE EXISTING CSX OWNED-AND-OPERATED TUNNEL AND TRACKS IN SE WASHINGTON DC APPROXIMATELY FROM SOUTH CAPITOL STREET TO WATER ST SE AND UNDERNEATH THE EASTBOUND LANES OF VIRGINIA AVE SE.
909 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
01/15/15 
SCARLET OAK / EVAN O'BRIEN/ D MCKEEVER SERVICES
TL1500002 / CONSTRUCTION
NEW TENANT LAYOUT FOR NEW 3754 SF RESTAURANT. PARTITION PLAN NEW COMMERCIAL KITCHEN BAR MILL WORK AND DINING AREA INCLUDED NO OUT SIDE SEATING ON THIS PERMIT.
1000 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
01/12/15 
CAPITOL HILL TOWER HOUSING COOPERATIVE INCF / RICHARD G. FINFROCK
P1502547 / SUPPLEMENTAL
1111 NEW JERSEY AVE SE   
01/23/15 
DONOHOE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY / DANIEL M. NARH
P1502702 / SUPPLEMENTAL
25 POTOMAC AVE SE   
01/12/15 
RIVERFRONT HOLDINGS I LLC / DANIEL M. NARH
P1502450 / SUPPLEMENTAL
816 POTOMAC AVE SE   
01/13/15 
JAMES ANDERSON 818 POTOMAC AVE SE LLC / WILLIAM WESTERM FROEHLING AND ROBERTSON INC.
SB1400485 / CONSTRUCTION
5 SOIL BORINGS EIGHT INCHES IN DIAMETER TO DEPTHS RANGING FROM 40 TO 60 FEET. SOIL BORINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN THE PARKING LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SECTION OF THE 816 POTOMAC AVE SE PROPERTY. HOLLOW STEM AUGER METHODS WILL BE USED TO CONDUCT THE SOIL BORINGS.
300 TINGEY ST SE   
01/23/15 
CM-YARDS LLC / DWIGHT SMITH; NONE
SG1400461 / CONSTRUCTION
INSTALL EXTERIOR SIGN ABOVE DOOR.
1301 WATER ST SE   
01/28/15 
EASTERN POWER BOAT CLUB / STANLEY HUBBARD JR
E90564415 / SUPPLEMENTAL
AH = After Hours; B = Alteration & Repair; D = Demolition; E = Electrical; FB = Boiler; M = Mechanical; P = Plumbing and Gas; PC = Post Card; R = Raze; SG = Sign; TL = Tenant Layout; TN = Tent; RW = Retaining Wall;

Real Property Sales Archive  
M ST   11/26/14
$ 2,000
LHREV WASHINGTON M STREET LLC
 
0770 M ST SE   11/14/14
$ 23,900,000
770 M STREET LLC
 


Project Directory




Blog/Home
Project Directory
Photo Archive
Event Photos
 
Nats Park
Food Map
What's New
History

 
Demolished Buildings
Historic Photos
Satellite Images
Timeline
 
About JDLand
Message JD
Advertise
Photo Use
 
     © Copyright 2015 JD.